Shaun Bevan, Enrico Borghetto, and Henrik Seeberg. 2024. “Do different parties respond to different problems? A comparative study of parliamentary questions across multiple countries.” Journal of European Public Policy 31(7): 1856–1878.
Parliaments
Agenda-Setting
Political Representation
Political Parties
Government and Coalitions
Shaun Bevan, Enrico Borghetto, and Henrik Seeberg. 2024. “Do different parties respond to different problems? A comparative study of parliamentary questions across multiple countries.” Journal of European Public Policy 31(7): 1856–1878. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2023.2193583
Abstract
The identification of problem information is an important driver of political attention in parliament. This is widely acknowledged in the literature on party competition but there has been surprisingly little empirical research on the extent and when it matters. By relying on an extensive cross-country data set matching data on the policy content of parliamentary oral questions from ten European parliamentary democracies with well-established problem indicators (economy, immigration, and terrorism), this study sets out to answer these important questions. Our time series analysis reveals that not all problem indicators drive political attention in parliament to the same extent and that responsiveness varies based on differences in how government and opposition parties strategically take up problems as well as a partisan logic between left and right parties. While real world problem indicators can be a strong driver of parliamentary attention, that drive is still filtered through political and institutional processes.
Citation
Shaun Bevan, Enrico Borghetto, and Henrik Seeberg. 2024. “Do different parties respond to different problems? A comparative study of parliamentary questions across multiple countries.” Journal of European Public Policy 31(7): 1856–1878. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2023.2193583